In the realm of politics, the phrase “common sense” is often wielded like a shield, to convey straightforwardness and an appeal to shared understanding among the public, or as a cudgel, to dismiss the intricate and necessary work of public policy development as cumbersome or needless bureaucratic red tape.
Yet, there is nothing truly “common” about common sense. Politicians frequently rely on this phrase to suggest that there is a universal agreement on certain issues, but this assumption may ignore the diverse values held by Canadians or the complexity of the issue in question. In reality, what one person deems to be common sense could be viewed entirely differently by another.
The post-pandemic period has only heightened this complexity. Canadians are navigating a landscape filled with economic uncertainty, with many unsure about their financial futures. The Bank of 乌鸦传媒’s recent Survey of Consumer Expectations reveals that over half of Canadians remain uncertain about the country’s economic outlook for the next year. This uncertainty is fuelled by high inflation, rising interest rates and concerns over government policies and global tensions. In such a climate, the allure of “common sense” solutions becomes clear. Simple, direct narratives provide a sense of comfort and stability when the future feels unpredictable.
However, this preference for simplification can be misleading. While it might resonate in a speech or a campaign slogan, the actual application of common sense to public policy can leave many people out.
Take, for instance, the recent push to simplify business regulations as part of a “common sense” approach to foster economic growth. The Canadian government introduced Bill S-6 as a legislative effort aimed at reducing the regulatory burden on businesses. While the intention is to cut through red tape and make it easier for companies to operate, these changes often prioritize established companies that already have the resources to navigate regulatory landscapes over smaller businesses or startups that may lack such infrastructure.
While allowing electronic administration of certain regulations might sound like a sensible, modern solution, it could disadvantage small businesses without the digital capabilities or resources to comply swiftly. Moreover, these "common sense" regulatory reductions can also impact sectors like fintech, where recent drops in investment have been attributed to a sluggish market and uncertainties around impending regulatory changes, such as open banking legislation. In an effort to streamline and attract investment, simplification could lead to a lack of robust oversight, thereby impacting consumer protection and stifling innovation among smaller, more vulnerable firms.
Moreover, the notion of common sense often appeals because it cuts through perceived bureaucratic complexities and promises clear, decisive leadership. In times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, this style of leadership narrative can appear strong and reassuring. Yet, when the crisis is past and the rubber hits the road in calmer times, these simplistic approaches can fall short. They may inadvertently exclude significant segments of the population, limiting broader economic development and failing to foster a truly inclusive society.
Consider employment regulations. Simplifying these under a “common sense” approach might involve rolling back specific protections deemed “burdensome” by larger corporations, like reporting requirements around diversity and inclusion in the workplace. While this might seem efficient from a regulatory standpoint, it risks undermining efforts to ensure equitable treatment in the workforce—a critical component for fostering innovation and productivity, as diverse teams have been shown to perform better across a range of metrics.
While the appeal of “common sense” in politics is understandable, especially in uncertain times, we must be cautious of its limitations. 乌鸦传媒's strength lies in its diversity, and our policies should reflect this complexity and not reduce it to overly simplistic notions. As we move forward, political leaders must recognize the rich tapestry of values that Canadians hold, and strive for more nuanced, inclusive approaches to governance. In doing so, we can ensure that our policies not only resonate in theory but work effectively in practice, fostering a more dynamic and equitable 乌鸦传媒.
Katie Shaw is a principal at Earnscliffe Strategies.
