OTTAWA — A Pacific Rim trade dispute panel has found ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½'s dairy-sector protections violate obligations that Ottawa signed with New Zealand and other countries.
The Liberal government, however, insists the ruling is a win, pointing to a clause that confirms ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ has some discretion over its imports.
The Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership includes certain quotas for countries to export dairy at preferred tariff rates into other member countries.
New Zealand says ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ is limiting its quotas to protect domestic dairy processors, who operate under federal rules regulating the cost and supply of products such as milk and cheese.
The country argues its dairy sector has lost the equivalent of $96 million in revenue from the Canadian market in the past three years due to the federal government "effectively blocking access for our dairy industry to upscale its exports" to ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½.
The dispute settlement panel issued a report on Tuesday that says it agrees with part of New Zealand's complaint, which dates back to May 2022. The panel ordered Ottawa to change how it uses tariff rate quotas, often called TRQs.
"It’s an important recognition that our exporters have not had fair access to the Canadian dairy market, in line with what we negotiated and paid for under CPTPP," wrote New Zealand's High Commissioner to ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½, Martin Harvey, in a statement.
“The outcome of the panel process leaves ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ no choice but to finally make TRQs available to those market players who have an incentive to use them," Harvey wrote, adding that he is confident the ruling wouldn't hinder relations between the two countries.
Australia and Japan filed submissions in support of New Zealand, while Mexico, Peru and Singapore also expressed an interest in pushing back against ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½'s use of dairy quotas.
Tuesday's dispute-settlement report sided with New Zealand on two complaints, finding the country could not use ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½'s quotas and that ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ gave priority access to its own dairy processors, while rejecting two other arguments.
The report noted it was "informative" that Washington had won a separate case on similar grounds to those raised by New Zealand, during a dispute under the ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½-United States-Mexico Agreement, which replaced the NAFTA trade deal.Â
Canadian Trade Minister Mary Ng did not speak to Ottawa's losses, instead saying it was a "clear victory" that the ruling acknowledged ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ has some leeway in how it applies the trade agreement.Â
"It confirms that ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ has the discretion to allocate TRQs, and that's really important to us," Ng told reporters Wednesday in Jakarta.
"They didn't think that we were allocating our TRQs in the way that they would like."
ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½'s influential domestic dairy lobby is calling on Ottawa to see whether it can launch retaliatory complaints against New Zealand.
"Dairy Farmers of ÎÚÑ»´«Ã½ is disappointed with the dispute panel’s ruling," wrote the group's president David Wiens.
"We now call on the federal government to do a thorough review of the measures the government of New Zealand has put in place to support its dairy sector, to ensure that they are consistent with its international trade obligations."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Sept. 6, 2023.
Dylan Robertson, The Canadian Press
Note to readers: This is a corrected story. A previous version said the dispute settlement panel for the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership issued its report on Wednesday.
